Overview

This page documents the math behind every cell on an LP report. If you’re an LP reconciling a statement against your own books, or a manager debugging why a fee number looks off, this is the source of truth. All formulas here match the renderer code one-to-one. The Renesis LP Report Studio (the engine behind the PDF) is the canonical implementation, if a future computation disagrees with what the report shows, the report wins.

NAV

Two NAV concepts appear on a report. They are not interchangeable.

Concept	What it represents	Sign
NAV (raw)	The actual market value of the portfolio: `Σ balance_i × price_i` across every asset. This is what your wallet / exchange tells you you’re worth right now.	Always ≥ 0
Gross NAV	NAV neutralized for capital flows: `nav_raw − total_deposits + total_withdrawals`. Used as the performance numerator, since deposits aren’t profit.	Can be negative

The strategy mini-card’s Net Asset Value tile shows NAV (raw), the real account value. The Period PnL tile shows the change in Gross NAV over the period, the part of the move that came from market performance, not flows. FX conversion to reporting currency: NAV is computed natively first (BTC for a BTC strategy, USD for a USDC strategy), then converted to the reporting currency using the end-of-period exchange rate. For fiat pairs we use ECB month-end reference rates; for crypto pairs we use on-chain spot at the snapshot block.

Returns

All return percentages on the report are time-weighted, flows in / out don’t distort them. For a single period [t0, t1]:

return = NAV_native(t1) / NAV_native(t0) − 1

We use the native NAV path (BTC for a BTC strategy) rather than the reporting-currency NAV. This isolates strategy yield from BTC↔EUR FX noise: a BTC strategy that earned exactly 1% in BTC reports +1% ITD even if BTC moved relative to EUR during the period.

Time horizons

Acronym	Meaning	Start anchor
MTD	Month-to-date	First day of the report’s end month
QTD	Quarter-to-date	First day of the report’s end quarter
YTD	Year-to-date	January 1 of the report’s end year
ITD	Inception-to-date	The strategy’s inception (or first day of data, see clamp below)
Period	Selected reporting period	Report’s `period_start`

Annualized return

annualized = (1 + ITD)^(365 / days_held) − 1

days_held is the number of calendar days between the strategy’s effective start (see clamp) and the period end. For periods shorter than 30 days the annualized figure is shown but should be read with appropriate skepticism, small windows magnify noise.

Inception clamp (data-start override)

A strategy’s contractual inception (from the editor) might predate the first day we actually have NAV data, e.g. the manager signed the LP agreement Feb 2025 but the on-chain wallet was only registered on Renesis in October. In that case the renderer uses the later of (contract inception, data start) so the ITD math has data to measure. The strategy card’s subtitle (“since 2025-10-22”) reflects the clamped date, not the contractual inception. The percentage is honest, it’s measured over the window we actually have data for. If you need contractual inception to surface alongside the data-start window, ask your Renesis contact.

Risk metrics

Computed from the daily native-NAV series over the period window.

Metric	Formula
Volatility (annualized)	`stdev(daily_returns) × √365`
Sharpe	`(mean(daily_returns) × 365) / (stdev × √365)`, risk-free rate set to 0 by default
Sortino	Same as Sharpe but `stdev` uses only negative daily returns
Max drawdown	`min((NAV_t − peak_NAV_t) / peak_NAV_t)` over the period
Downside deviation	`stdev` of negative daily returns only, annualized

Daily granularity is the reconcile cadence. Strategies that hold positions reconciling less often (e.g. some illiquid vaults) inherit the cadence of their slowest leg.

Fees

The fee table on page 3 is the part LPs scrutinize most. Here’s the exact math.

Per-month decomposition

For each month M that falls inside the reporting period:

days(M, period) = number of calendar days of M that fall inside [period_start, period_end]
                  (a full month: 28-31; a partial month: only the in-period days)

AUM_native(M)   = end-of-month native NAV (default: current EOM basis)
PnL_native(M)   = native NAV change over month M, excluding flows

mgmt_native(M)  = AUM_native(M) × mgmt_pct / 100 × days(M, period) / 365
perf_native(M)  = max(0, PnL_native(M) − mgmt_native(M)) × perf_pct / 100
total_native(M) = mgmt_native(M) + perf_native(M)

Then for each month we convert to reporting currency using the month-end FX:

mgmt_rep(M)  = mgmt_native(M)  × FX_native→reporting(eom of M)
perf_rep(M)  = perf_native(M)  × FX_native→reporting(eom of M)
total_rep(M) = total_native(M) × FX_native→reporting(eom of M)

Per-month FX (not period-end FX) is used so that a fee earned in March is converted at March-end rates, preserving the value the manager actually charged in that month even if the FX moved later in the period.

Period totals

period_mgmt_native  = Σ mgmt_native(M)   over all months in the period
period_perf_native  = Σ perf_native(M)
period_total_native = period_mgmt_native + period_perf_native

Same for the reporting-currency column. The grand total at the bottom of the fee table is the sum of period_total_native (or _rep) across every strategy.

Reconciling the performance fee

The performance fee is computed after the management fee on the same monthly bucket. The intuition:

“I charge 15% on what’s left after I pay myself the management fee.”

So if PnL_native(M) = 100, mgmt_native(M) = 12, perf_pct = 15:

perf_native(M) = max(0, 100 − 12) × 0.15 = 88 × 0.15 = 13.20

A common LP error: computing perf = 100 × 0.15 = 15 ignores the mgmt deduction. The report’s number will be lower than the naive calc. Also note the max(0, …), performance fee is never negative. A losing month accrues no performance fee, but the management fee still applies (the manager still gets paid for managing the AUM, regardless of performance).

AUM basis, current vs prior EOM

The AUM_native(M) term above uses the current EOM convention by default, fee for month K is computed on the AUM at end of month K. Many institutional mandates use prior EOM instead: fee for month K is computed on the AUM at end of month K−1 (the AUM the manager already had under management when the month started). Set this in the Report Workspace under Reporting → AUM Basis. The two conventions produce different monthly fee numbers, the difference can be material in fast-growing months. Check what your management agreement specifies.

High-water mark and hurdle rate

The 4-page LP report does not apply HWM or hurdle rate to performance fees today. If your fee schedule includes a hurdle (e.g. 15% over SOFR + 200 bps), the displayed performance fee is computed on full positive PnL, you may need to manually deduct the hurdle in a manual adjustment until HWM support ships. HWM is supported in LP Portal V1 (the multi-LP share-accounting feature, separate from the 4-pager). If you need per-investor HWM tracking with capital events, that’s the path.

Per-month visual / period total reconciliation

The fee table shows up to 3 month columns. For periods longer than 3 months, the first 3 months are displayed; the period total column still sums across all months in the period. So a 5-month report’s column total = sum of months 1-5, while the visible cells only show months 1-3. Sub-unit native fees (e.g. 0.0134 BTC on a small ellenBTC mandate) can render as 0.01 at 2dp precision and stop adding visually to the period total. Bump Crypto Fee Precision in the Report Workspace to 4 to see the full magnitude. Even smaller values (below the precision threshold) render in subscript notation (0.0₂459 BTC means 0.00459) so the LP can read the real number.

Holdings table

The top-10 holdings table on page 3 lists positions sorted by reporting-currency value, descending.

Column	Definition
Holding	Asset symbol as reported by the underlying ledger
Strategy	Which configured strategy the holding rolls into. Holdings with no matching strategy show ”, “
Allocation %	`value_reporting / total_AUM_reporting × 100`
PnL	Asset-level realized + unrealized PnL since the strategy’s effective start

The donut chart on page 1 uses the strategy roll-up, not individual holdings, so if your ellenUSDC strategy holds 5 different vaults under the symbol ellenUSDC, they’re aggregated as one wedge.

Manual adjustments

The Adjustments section in the Report Workspace lets you apply per-period overrides that don’t touch the underlying ledger. Typical uses:

Portfolio NAV adjustment, bump or trim total AUM (e.g. to include an off-chain holding the ledger doesn’t track).
Per-strategy NAV adjustment, same, scoped to one strategy.
Per-strategy fee delta, add or subtract a specific fee amount (e.g. apply a hurdle deduction manually).
Portfolio fee delta, same, scoped to total fees; distributes proportionally across strategies.

Adjustments are presentation-only. They appear in a disclosure footer on the report (“Adjustments applied: …”) so the LP can see the manager’s intervention.

Currency conventions

Native currency: the strategy’s denomination (BTC, ETH, USDC, USD, EUR, …). Drives the strategy card’s ”≈” cross-reference line.
Reporting currency: the single currency every chart, NAV card, and fee total is expressed in. Set per report.
FX: ECB month-end rates for fiat pairs, on-chain spot at the snapshot block for crypto. The recon job pulls these once per day; the report uses the values cached at the period end.

Display precision:

Fiat headline cells (NAV, Period PnL, fund total AUM, grand-total fee): 2dp by default; toggle Round Fiat Decimals in the Report Workspace to drop cents.
Per-month fee cells: 2dp for fiat strategies (keeps row arithmetic exact); per-report configurable for crypto strategies (2 / 4 / 6 dp).
Sub-precision crypto cells: subscript notation (0.0₂459) for values that would round to “0.00” at the chosen precision.

Common reconciliation questions

”Your AUM is different from my vault dashboard”

The LP report aggregates every wallet attached to the report’s portfolio under the symbol roll-up. If two wallets both hold Onyx USDC under the symbol ellenUSDC, they sum into one strategy NAV. Your vault dashboard shows just one wallet. To reconcile, list the wallets in your Renesis portfolio and confirm the AUM is the sum across all of them.

”Your performance fee is lower than I expected”

The performance fee is computed on PnL after the management fee is deducted (same month). If you computed perf = PnL × perf_pct directly, you’ll be high, see Reconciling the performance fee.

”Your NAV chart starts later than my inception date”

The inception date on the strategy card is clamped to the first day we have NAV data. The percentage is honest for that window, it’s just shorter than your contractual mandate length. Backfilling earlier data requires reconciling history with the wallet’s earlier transactions; talk to your Renesis contact if you need this.

”Your AUM basis disagrees with my management agreement”

Set Reporting → AUM Basis to Prior EOM if your agreement specifies that management fees are charged on the AUM you walked into the month with. The default Current EOM charges on what you ended the month with.

Tutorial, building your first report

Step-by-step walk through the Report Workspace, from creating a report to rendering the PDF.

Getting Started

Methodology

API Reference

Methodology

Overview

NAV

Returns

Time horizons

Annualized return

Inception clamp (data-start override)

Risk metrics

Fees

Per-month decomposition

Period totals

Reconciling the performance fee

AUM basis, current vs prior EOM

High-water mark and hurdle rate

Per-month visual / period total reconciliation

Holdings table

Manual adjustments

Currency conventions

Common reconciliation questions

”Your AUM is different from my vault dashboard”

”Your performance fee is lower than I expected”

”Your NAV chart starts later than my inception date”

”Your AUM basis disagrees with my management agreement”

Tutorial, building your first report

​Overview

​NAV

​Returns

​Time horizons

​Annualized return

​Inception clamp (data-start override)

​Risk metrics

​Fees

​Per-month decomposition

​Period totals

​Reconciling the performance fee

​AUM basis, current vs prior EOM

​High-water mark and hurdle rate

​Per-month visual / period total reconciliation

​Holdings table

​Manual adjustments

​Currency conventions

​Common reconciliation questions

​”Your AUM is different from my vault dashboard”

​”Your performance fee is lower than I expected”

​”Your NAV chart starts later than my inception date”

​”Your AUM basis disagrees with my management agreement”

Tutorial, building your first report

Overview

NAV

Returns

Time horizons

Annualized return

Inception clamp (data-start override)

Risk metrics

Fees

Per-month decomposition

Period totals

Reconciling the performance fee

AUM basis, current vs prior EOM

High-water mark and hurdle rate

Per-month visual / period total reconciliation

Holdings table

Manual adjustments

Currency conventions

Common reconciliation questions

”Your AUM is different from my vault dashboard”

”Your performance fee is lower than I expected”

”Your NAV chart starts later than my inception date”

”Your AUM basis disagrees with my management agreement”